[…]as much as we insisted, in the first part of our work [Anti-Oedipus], on large dualities, today we’re looking for the new mode of unification in which, for example, the schizophrenic discourse, the intoxicated discourse, the perverted discourse, the homosexual discourse, all the marginal discourses can subsist, so that all these escapes and discourses can graft themselves onto a war-machine that won’t reproduce a State or Party Apparatus. For that very reason we no longer want to talk about schizoanalysis, because that would amount to protecting a particular type of escape, schizophrenic escape. What interests us is a sort of link that leads us back to the direct political problem, and the direct political problem for us is more or less this: until now, revolutionary parties have constituted themselves as syntheses of interests rather than functioning as analyzers of mass and individual desires. Or else, what amounts to the same: revolutionary parties have constituted themselves as embryonic State apparatuses, instead of forming war-machines irreducible to such apparatuses.